In a world where political correctness or politically "opportune" dictate the rules of information and now of thought, there is a neutral and unbiased source capable of candidly answering almost all questions: Artificial Intelligence.
We asked new questions to "GAIA" (ChatGPT), asking to be concise and direct, to try to understand a disturbing but increasingly evident geopolitical framework. A reality that in the Belpaese they want to hide so as not to scare the "flock"?
What do the US military plans include “by 2027”?
The US military plans to have 2027 ready for a possible conflict with China, with particular focus on:
• Increase the operational readiness of ships, submarines and aircraft.
• Integrate advanced technologies, such as autonomous systems and AI.
• Strengthen global alliances and joint operations.
• Prepare for multi-domain warfare, both conventional and cyber. The goal is to ensure a military force ready to prevail in a potential conflict.
Does “being ready” mean “being ready to win”?
Yes, “being ready” in the US military plans by 2027 means be ready to win in a possible conflict, especially against China, ensuring operational, technological and strategic superiority.
Will the inevitable military confrontation on the horizon also occur between artificial intelligences?
Yes, the inevitable military confrontation will be especially among artificial intelligences, with AI playing a crucial role in cyberwarfare, systems autonomy, information management and battlefield decision-making.
If defeat were considered certain after 2027, what option would an artificial intelligence suggest to the Beijing regime?
If defeat were certain after 2027, AI should suggest to the Beijing regime to anticipate the conflict before opponents are fully ready, taking advantage of surprise and temporary advantages.
China will use AI at all levels of command, military and political. Will it have an advantage against adversaries who, when talking about war, impose constraints, limitations and "human" times?
Yes. AI offers speed of decision-making, advanced analytics, and the ability to manage large amounts of data in real time, enabling rapid and optimized responses. If China can harness AI without the same ethical, political, or operational constraints that might hold back adversaries, it could gain a significant strategic advantage, both in the planning and execution of military operations.
Will militarily unprepared and ill-equipped US allies planning a credible 10-15 year defense be shunned and ignored or will they be the likely first target?
They would probably be the first target in a conflict. Perceived as vulnerable, they may be attacked before they have a chance to strengthen, in the hope of splitting them from the United States and quickly neutralizing them.
But if a US ally had, just a few years earlier, been subservient to the orders of the Beijing regime, could it save itself or would it be "punished" severely by coming to its senses?
It would probably be punished severely. The Chinese regime may view him as a traitor or an example to be held up to other countries, making him a target for diplomatic, economic, or military retaliation, with the aim of deterring others from similar behavior.
Who will pay the greatest consequences in that country, the traitors or a stupid people (who for the most part have also stopped voting)?
The country will probably pay the greatest consequences the people, especially if politically disengaged and unable to influence the course of events. In conflict or retaliation scenarios, it is often ordinary people who suffer the most severe effects, such as economic impact, loss of security and social tensions, while so-called "traitors" or political elites may be able to mitigate their losses or transfer the burden of the consequences.
