Dear readers, I am inspired by a note sent by the Navy (more) which specifies on some news disclosed in the press today.
These last few weeks there has been a great tam tam of news in the newspapers linked to the line of inquiry called "Trivellopoli".
As director of a newspaper that follows military events, I caught an anomaly a few days ago. Exactly on April 2, some newspapers even re-titled their editions during the night (see last image at the bottom) in order to put a uniform on the front page. Reading the articles, it was not clear why the soldier was appointed.
Admiral De Giorgi's photo was re-launched by all the media over the weekend. However, no newspaper has been able to explain the content of the charges or the alleged facts to the admiral. Why?
The attack took on definite contours in the following days: a slow and almost daily handing out of accusations - almost all centered on events that occurred in the past - seductive to a hungry public accustomed to national scandals but which suggests an architecture behind this attack. Recall that the accusation with which mud was thrown on the Navy and on its head was even that di criminal association, but then declassified into abuse of office.
What would the admiral have done? He would, for example, promote and then transfer an admiral stationed in Augusta simply because "uncomfortable ". The promotion was shouted at the scandal, but I came into possession of an 2014 document signed by a commission (see detail on the right) - then a decision collegial e not single as accused - and countersigned by Minister Pinotti, who sees Admiral Camerini in pole position for promotion in 2015, because the first three were promoted in 2014. (see full document below). It is now clear that the shouted motivation to "promote to remove" seems to be a boasted credit of someone who boasted titles on the phone that he didn't have (Colicchi-Gemini interception). The first comes to mind interview with the secret services spokesman in which, referring to suspected suspects who presented themselves as service men, stated that "in the dressing room of the five-a-side football I can also shoot it big saying I'm the man of Belen, outside the reality is quite different ..."
Whoever has had the opportunity to follow the contemporary history of the Navy will have noticed that in the last three years the Navy - it was by now reduced to the minimum terms compared to the numerous tasks she is required to perform (Mare Nostrum was an example of this along with many other foreign missions) - thanks to the action of its chief of staff, it had an important echo in many circles and managed to pass a law that, even if it does not revolutionize it, saves it from certain death. The accusation is also here that we have sought convergence through raising awareness of the importance of the maritime sector for a country like Italy.
I am reminded of the comment of a blogger who wrote: “But who should the admiral ask the Pope for money?”. He always said that what he did is what is expected of a chief of staff: the safeguarding of his own armed force.
With the launch of Naval Program several well-informed sources told me before that De Giorgi ("man pignolo") would also have clashed with the managing director of Fincantieri during the examination of commissioned naval units, demanding compliance with the highest quality parameters.
Analyzing the time span in which the whole story developed, it seems strange to me that the name of the head of the Navy was mentioned, as I have already mentioned, even without any other news on Friday, when the following Monday the council of ministers should have choose a possible head of civil protection and, since the admiral's mandate is about to expire (next June 21) and given his precedents in this sector (you will remember theoperation Tiber, in which the admiral then chief of staff of the IOC directed the operations that allowed, with the use of helmsmen of the Vespucci and Navy raiders, to free the Sant'Angelo bridge from obstructions and thus avert the flooding of Rome), his, would surely have been a papilla name even if uncomfortable for many of his enemies.
Yes, at this point the admiral must have many enemies and also very powerful ones given the level of accusations and the baseness of the ways in which they were advanced. "Suggested" accusations and resumed without asking too many questions?
