The ANSA news of 13 July that India is about to accept the Italian request for international arbitration has suddenly awakened a long lethargy that has involved many political figures and information.
In fact, these are roaring words that are submerging us to announce an almost impossible success. Today 's decisions, the Farnesina supports, confirm the consolidation of the arbitration process undertaken by Italy on June 26 ", forgetting that the international initiative in itinere had already been prepared and was ready since 18 March 2013, suddenly canceled by the Government of the moment.
Forgetfulness or communication choices?
The second hypothesis would appear more plausible considering that the announcements of that day are still online on the website of the MFA (more).
We have mentioned this several times but faced with the unexplainable omissions of information that seem to afflict a great many Italian media outlets, it is considered very opportune to put in place an ancient recommendation, ?? repeating helps?
Today, even on the pages of Corriere della Sera, Dr. Taino highlights this choice as normal with unequivocal words ?? Above all, it has been confirmed as a normal choice in disputes between states, which does not necessarily involve bitter clashes but which indeed has the possibility of creating clarity. He also added in a statement yesterday, the Italian Foreign Ministry claimed that the Indian government's decision to participate in the arbitration and the lengthening of Latorre's stay in Italy - "even if for a period of less than what we requested »- they confirm« the consolidation of the arbitration process undertaken by Italy on June 26 », but forgetting to point out that more than two years have been lost to the total detriment of our soldiers.
Imprecision not shared by the writer like me by passion and not by profession. I prefer, therefore, to remember those distant days because I consider them a fundamental part in the whole affair. Facts that in my humble opinion stigmatize the 'absolute indifference of someone who at the top of the state preferred to make choices of opportunities preferring the defense of economic interests reputed to prevail over that of human and legal rights of two Italian citizens involved in problems resulting from • State assignments ?? L '' I did on several occasions and not last today with a thought published by the head ?? InTerris ?? that I propose again: http://www.interris.it/2015/07/14/66301/intervento/maro-due-anni-buttati-via.html
Two Governments have succeeded since that March of 2013, many words but zero facts. Today we return to walk a road that had been opened in the past, hailing it as a political success resulting from careful diplomatic work, but we fail to analyze a sentence by the representative of the Indian Government (Solicitor General), Ranjit Kumar, who specified 'another to the ANSA ?? that India "will participate to tell the referees that the jurisdiction is ours and not Italy".
Many declarations, not least that of the honorable Fabrizio Cicchitto (NCD) that at 'ANSA spoke of "significant steps fruit of a difficult job both by the government and by this government," forgetting that everything had been prepared and started more than two years ago.
When is a parliamentary inquiry committee?
Fernando Termentini
