The two marò: even Napolitano is wrong?

27/04/14

Marco Lillo yesterday published an article in the "daily newspaper" article that in fact denies the guaranteed traditions of the newspaper's political current to which the newspaper refers, tracing an analysis of the facts that start - in the absence of certain evidence and a sentence - from statements of guilt and not of presumed innocence as instead a State of Law would like.

(http://www.dagospia.com/rubrica-29/cronache/non-rompete-maro-mentre-italia-napolitano-giu-76119.htm) Do not break the Marò - while in Italy, from Napolitano down, all to make rhetoric about the "held" or "prisoner" Fucilieri in India make it easy: they killed two fishermen ...

The author is inspired by the words of President Napolitano who, during the celebration of 25 April, combined moments of resistance to the story of the marines, writing

Reading is also wonderful

Surely Dr. Lillo in democracy you can say anything but in my humble opinion his invitation to President Napolitano is forced

I ask you and I wonder why the head of the armed forces and the Italians should be concerned about the Indian elections in claiming rights under international conventions.

He will, however, like to know that I am among those who in addition to inquiring about "Libero or Il Giornale" (I hope he does not have to hurt) also does so by reading the Corriere, Repubblica, Avvenire and also the Daily Fact. Perhaps because of this I see the story of what happened in India not only "with the eyes of Latorre and Girone" but also "with those of Ajeesh Pink, a fisherman of 25 years of the village of Eraiyumanthurai in the south of Tamil Nadu. His father, after an accident that took away two limbs in the 2003, died ".

Precisely for this reason I invoke the right of men to be judged by their natural judge and not by the one imposed by Delhi or the dominant political currents in Kerala, and I do so - allow me - with the clarity of thought common to those who inform about 360 ° not just reading part stories.

I appreciate his human sense in talking about the dead and families and I share their spirit, but I cannot appreciate his guilty approach which, moreover, derives from the affirmation

According to the Indian fishermen on St Anthony everyone was asleep after a night of fishing ... Captain Freddy Louis said he was awakened by the sound of the siren and discovered the helmsman Jelestine already dead. Then a 'continuous fire at a distance of about 200 meters' would have killed Ajesh too.>

Precisely for this reason we should be cautious in the conclusions also considering that the Indian version as known is refuted by the analysis of Italian experts while Indian investigators still have to produce certain evidence.

I would also invite you to deepen your statements when he writes that the Indian expertise was made in front of our carabinieri. It would be appropriate, in fact, that in this regard it traces the facts, because the RIS experts were forbidden to attend the comparative balistic analysis.

I conclude by begging you not to resort to Einstein: "Nationalism is a childish disease, it is the measles of humanity", to challenge the words of the head of the armed forces who have long been waiting for us. Personally I am immune, believe me, from the "measles" to which Einstein referred, and unlike others, perhaps more pleasant to her, reject any form of antimilitarism and the denial of the preconceived values ​​that have made our country great.

I affirm it with the personal conviction that the sense of the State and the Country as a land that preserves the remains of those who preceded us and handed down the traditions, is not an infectious disease, but the spring to continue to work for the growth of our nation .

I undersign it on the basis of my past experience with those in Kosovo, Bosnia, Kuwait, Lebanon and Afghanistan, who have honored Italy by guaranteeing human rights to others, without fear of contracting contagious diseases.

Fernando Termentini