Italy that is "renewed": Beelzebub, antipatriotism and dishonor?

(To Andrea Cucco)
17/04/18

A missed opportunity. For the attack against Syria positions could be two: participate or oppose. As always we have found the third - infamous - way: do not participate and do not oppose us.

Has the fear of displeasing the Quirinale, in such a delicate situation for the birth of a new government, castrated every possible space for truth or justice? Likely.

Also wanting, as Admiral De Giorgi wrote yesterday (v.articolo), could not we? Sure!

It was not about being pro-US, pro-NATO, pro-Russian or pro-Assad. The question was simple: to be worthy heirs of the almost 3000 years of a civilization based on law.

Because we boast of guarantees in the homeland by stating that we are innocent until proven guilty and, when the blood is of others, we fuck each other taking for granted a responsibility (more)?

Has the government of Damascus, one step away from victory, authorized the use of gas in an area where most of the rebels had already been evacuated? Then it must be fought, sanctioned and perhaps annihilated.

In the absence of evidence, being the "homeland of law" (the same one whose mouth is filled every time you want to have the training of law enforcement or judiciary in a country to be rebuilt ...), it means that we must oppose interventions without certain tests.

What if the use of gas by the rebels was tried instead? Would we have the same nerve?

Someone said after the bombings that it was "the time not to think and not talk" (more). With goosebumps, the thought returned to 7 years ago, at the time when we observed unarmed (in addition to the violation of national air spaces) to the massacre of a country, Libya, which after a few years still pays the trust granted previously to Italy.

This is the time to talk! This is the moment to think!

Churches all over the world have been appealing for years, unheard, for the end of the massacre in Syria. In words all agree. In fact, he is complicit.

Have we taught the barbarians the law? Someone should explain the term "consistency" to us.

Then there are those who use the "scriminante" of the 11 article of the Constitution (in reality we should refer to the art.10 ...). A source that suggests to be sheep and to look like the wolves that devour the sheep? Let's remind the Sunday constitutionalist masochists that the only aspect of the supreme law of the state - the one for too many mortals to us from the Constituent returning from Mount Sinai ... - is only the Republican form of the State! In times of reform it is perhaps time to review the "surrender treaty" of a defeated country?

Who has condemned the aggression without finding fault will be worthy of representing the still decent part of the country. If not today in five years? Not bad, he will have an absolute majority.

Those who have not done so are queued today to a policy that has respectable hands but dirty with blood. Innocent blood ...

Of course, now yes, #NotInMyName!

(photo: Quirinale)